Design notebook: Raincoast Juliana

I’m three balls into the husband sweater now, and very pleased with the way the pattern is working. A combination of different stitches give the sweater a very pleasing texture that I didn’t expect when I looked at the pictures. A couple of ferry trips and a family visit later – and I’m 2/3rds done the back – hoping to have the whole back section finished by this evening after I get some homework and housework done!

While I was away my mother admired my Purplette Juliana – which I am utterly in love with. (I have now worn it twice, and it really is both a beautiful ornament and a practical shawl for keeping the shoulders warm.) She admired it so much in fact, that I have decided that will be my next project and hopefully in time for Christmas! I ordered the yarn from Sweet Georgia this morning – which can take up to four weeks because it is dyed-to-order. That gives me enough time to finish the husband sweater, while still leaving room before the holidays to get the shawl done.

Here are the colours for my mother’s Juliana (which I’m calling the Raincoast – these colourways are spruce and oceanside):

Beautiful, yes? And I’ve chosen the superwash merino option this time – both for ease of care, and because it will be softer than the nylon/wool blend sockyarn I used before (chosen because it was what was on offer at my local yarn store). Even though I’ve just completed this very pattern, I find myself excited to do it over in a different colourway – which just goes to show how much I love this particular piece.

The husband sweater.

Last night/this morning, I laid down a row of foundation double-crochet to start a sweater for my dear B.  Having now completed a first sweater for myself, I can conceptualize what goes into such a yarn-commitment and have decided that yes, definitely, my partner is definitely worth it!

But what about the sweater curse?

Those of you who don’t crochet or knit probably don’t know about the “sweater curse“. This particular piece of knit-lore maintains that starting a sweater for one’s significant other pretty much spells the end of the relationship. Some people say that this only applies to boyfriends, but others maintain it always applies, no matter the status of the relationship. Over at the wikipedia article I linked to above, there are several rationales provided that explain the real-world mechanics of what’s behind this belief. I tend to think that a lot of what has fueled the superstition – particularly where boyfriends are concerned – is that making a sweater for someone implies a certain level of commitment that the other person may not be ready for (and thus bails, before the sweater is finished).

In order to dispel myself of the myth in embarking upon this project, let’s look at the other reasons it might apply (and dispel them one-by-one).

  • Unlucky timing. While it’s true that crocheting a sweater takes some time, I can’t imagine our relationship is on its way to doom in the next month. We’ve been together five years. Things are awesome. Brian will have his sweater by Christmas. All is good.
  • Rescue mission. Nope, I do not subconsciously sense  our marriage is over. It’s awesome all the time!
  • Catalyst for analyzing the relationship. I think B and I spend a lot of time assessing our relationship already – and we both agree. It is awesome!
  • Aversion. I was worried about whether B. would really want a handmade sweater, because not everyone likes hand”knits”, or wool garments. Turns out he is stupidly excited by the prospect of getting a sweater from me. And he’s not just faking either (I can tell).
  • Misdirected attention. Our relationship is awesome! (Have I said that already?) I really do try to make sure that no matter how obsessive I am about making stuff, B. gets lots of my attention too. One of the reasons I want to make things for him is so he can have my attention in my “make” space as well as in other ways.
  • Delusion. Nope. I don’t think for a second I’m deluded about our relationship. We’ve been together more than five years, we’re crazy about each other, and we work hard at making every day special for each other even after all this time.
  • Limit of Human Gratitude. B. brings me coffee in bed every single morning. As far as I’m concerned, crocheting him a sweater barely touches that in terms of commitment level to another person.

Really, this is the first time I have made more than a scarf or small household object for B., and it feels like the right time. I’ve got some good crochet-skills going on, I have an idea of what would suit B., and I really want to make him something both practical and loving that is just for him.

So sweater curse? I think the awesomeness of my marriage mitigates the potential for sweater-making to damage our love. Fingers crossed, eh?

Older *and* smarter.

image

The fog from early this morning has given way to brilliant sunshine and I am borrowing a cubicle in which rays of sun actually fall on the desk at certain times of day – lucked out with this busted computer thing for a change! But despite this bright morning, it’s feeling very transitional in Vancouver these days, and I  expect soon to be plunged into the rain that never ends. Until May at least. Or maybe even July. So brief the dry months!

I’m working on a term paper right now about the nature of story and social construction, how stories are used as an ideological prop even when demonstrably false, and what we need to consider if we are going to be successful in changing the story, and thus changing society.  I haven’t gotten to the writing part yet,  it’s all reading and listening to lectures off the Internet – (my favourite part of working on a paper – the preparing part).

Last night we were listening to Charles Taylor’s 1991 Massey Lectures on the Malaise of Modernity and I realized (into the 2nd lecture) that I read these lectures for a political science class in my first year of college (nineteen years ago). I had read them, yes, and in particular the phrase “ethic of authenticity” has stuck with me all these years – but what I remembered last night was how little I (at the age of twenty) had a clue as to what Taylor was talking about.

It’s not that Malaise is particularly difficult writing, the Massey Lecture series is aimed at the accessibility of ideas after all. But it is political philosophy. And like all good scholarship, it draws on a knowledge of the history of western philosophy – something I knew almost nothing about in 1993 fresh out of high school and working in bars and restaurants. What stands out from that class is how out of depth I felt with all the discussions, and that at one point the professor wrote on a term paper “this is supposed to be a research essay, not a polemic.” This and other weird experiences lead me to switch my major from Poli Sci to Communications when I entered SFU two years later, and I haven’t given much thought to those discourses since.

What’s interesting about turning back to this work now –  after an undergrad degree, a lot of reading and life experience, and a year and a half of graduate-level education in philosophy – is my “observation” of how much my ability to think has changed since I was a young adult. As much as I feel that I am not as “fast” at picking up new skills or memorizing information as it once was, I do recognize that my accumulated knowledge allows me to come at all new information from a much deeper and considered place. Which is a bit of a “yeah, duh,” but still comes as a shock to me even though I’ve got a prolific reading history to back my thoughts up (not to mention all the conversations I get to have with smart people like my partner).

Sewing, crochet, gardening, and other concrete practices all have an observable element. A here-to-there line that is understood through the practice of doing over and over to recognizable improvement. But the mind? It’s unobservable. We can not really remember what our state of mind once was because by the time we are remembering, we have grown and left that previous shadow of ourselves behind. So while we might think about things we once did, and deduce an earlier existence from a different frame of mind or thought (yeah. punk rock! party every night!), it is hard to recall that actual thinking/feeling state in which we did exist. Got it? (Incidentally, that’s why you can never go home again either.)

All this to say – last night’s listening brought me back to the person I was twenty years ago – and briefly enabled a comparison between my current and former states of mind. Guess what? Twenty years later, I am much smarter. And the last year of reading and thinking in grad school has had a lot to do with that. My memory is pretty crappy (always has been), but my thinking seems to have room for improvement. Even now, at almost-forty! Which means this education thing has been good for more than just my self-esteem.

Interested in Charles Taylor? His book The Ethics of Authenticity is available online here.

So few words to share…..

Somehow it’s already the middle of November, even though Halloween was like – yesterday. Wasn’t it? Or is it just the normal acceleration of end-of-term, birthdays, Christmas and everything else hurtling in all at once?

Of course, the more I have  to do, the more I just want to hang out at home and make things. Because I’m brain-dead at the moment. Under-slept, over-read, and out of creative solutions to workplace problems. I’ve got a term paper topic now at least, which means I can start writing this week – but when it comes to the blog I have little to say.

So more project photos it is — a stack of eight placemats crocheted this fall to give to my mother on her birthday (this weekend):

I finished the Juliana shawl yesterday too, but it’s blocking so no photos for a couple of days. This is all of my life I can share right now – what I am making, since I feel at such a loss of brain space and words!