Red Cedar

I just wanted to post a quick note about Friday’s blog article – on the question of whether a photograph exists of my great-great-Uncle’s plane in flight. While the original photograph does not exist, John Brown believes he has found evidence of the photograph existing as part of an exhibition which you can read about here. There has long been a rumour that a photograph once did exist that showed the plane in the air (according the news reports and eyewitness accounts) – and according to some analysis of an exhibition photo – it looks as though that was the case. Unfortunately it requires blowing a photograph of a photograph up to such a degree that all you can really see are blurry shapes that might correspond to an object in flight.

Personally, I don’t think the photograph is what matters because history isn’t based on what we have a visual record for and there is plenty of other evidence that I think is way more compelling. But John Brown does make a good case for the existence of the photograph and has some analysis about the way lithographs were used instead of photos in newspapers of the day. Worth a read, for sure.

A German phone number showed up on my cel phone this morning – and in the midst of some work stress (read panic) regarding a web application I am launching next week – I decided to answer it. My family being from Germany originally (more than 100 years ago now), and having visited there in my teens – it seemed plausible that someone from Germany might actually be phoning (as opposed to a telemarketing scam, which mostly seem to come from Quebec and never from mainland Europe).

On the phone was the aviation historian John Brown – and Australian living in Munich – who apparently has been researching my Great-Great-Uncle Gustave’s case for first flight (before the Wright brothers) for some time. For those of you who don’t know, Gustave Whitehead (uncle aforementioned) was a German immigrant to America in the mid 1890s who (after a series of run-ins with the law and cranky neighbours in Pittsburgh and Boston) ended up in Bridgeport Connecticut. It is there, in 1901, that he is said to have flown the first airplane in history – 2 years and some months before the Wright brothers.

While no picture of the aircraft in flight remains, there is plenty of evidence that this flight happened – newspaper reports, eyewitness accounts, and recreations of Whitehead’s plane in the 1980s by Andy Kosch and again by a German group in the 90s which proved it could indeed fly. On the other side are the Wright family and the Smithsonian, with a conspiratorial contract drawn up in 1948 which states that if the Smithsonian is ever to give credence to others who flew before the Wrights, they will lose the famous plane which they have hanging in their aviation museum.

Anyhow – I have a website which documents this history – gustavewhitehead.org, as does John Brown – gustave-whitehead.com if you are interested in reading more about the history, the documentation and the controversy that has raged between the two sides over the past hundred years.

What Brown was calling to tell me in any case is that in its hundredth edition now in print – Jane’s All the World’s Aircraft has included a foreward attesting  my Uncle Gustave as the first in powered flight.

This is an incredibly big deal, it turns out. (It took me a few minutes to understand exactly what I was being told). And there are articles coming out shortly in American History and Flight magazines which we hope will carry the same message: The Wrights were not first in powered flight.

Growing up in my family, with the books of Stella Randolph (a journalist who wrote a book about Whitehead first in the 1930s, collecting many of the affidavits that have proven to be invaluable to his case) and family stories floating around – it has never been a question that Gustave Whitehead flew first. Of course it had to be so!

But it’s not a story I share very often just the same because it sounds too “made-up” as my grade 10 social studies teacher told me when he gave me a poor grade on a paper about my not-so-famous relation. Sometimes when there are geeks about my house, I show them my dogeared copy of Randolph’s book from the thirties, and a later book from the sixties as well. But that’s about all. It’s one of those funny-little-facts about the family – and it’s not particularly relevant to anything in my life so it’s not like it comes up very often.

But still! Official recognition from the world’s definitive source on aircraft is exciting! And it was a totally unexpected phone call to be sure (he got my number from the registration for my .org website above). Despite the fact it’s been in the US media, I haven’t seen any stories up here so I would have completely missed this historic moment otherwise.

Apparently there’s going to be some kind of a thing in Connecticut in June and I’m thinking that if it works timewise, and I can get a ticket on points…. hmmm. maybe I might even think about going. Between that and the reunion later this summer, there should be lots to talk about with regards to our family name finally making it into the history books for real.

Walking to work this morning I heard an owl hooting a warning, woodpeckers tapping at the telephone poles, and lots of songbirds. I was glad to have left  my headphones off for a change.

In March, Canada posted the loss of 54,000 jobs. That’s right folks, 54,000 jobs disappeared in one month, wiping out the gain of 50,000 jobs in February plus some. And it’s not like jobs have been plentiful around here to start with. From what I can tell by canvassing friends in Vancouver – even if you are a worker with skills (IT, Communications, Administrative Management etc) – it can take as long as 18 months to find a job after losing one. And even if you do find a job, it probably pays less than what you made at the last place.

Even though I am employed, I occasionally throw my resume at a posting for which I am qualified (and pays enough, and looks interesting:  about two jobs per year) – cause why not? And even though I have a sold skills base, a good resume, and consider myself fairly personable by cover letter – I have had a single interview in the last five years. One interview for approximately ten applications. And remember, I am only applying for jobs which I am one hundred per cent qualified to do.

So although I don’t know the frustration of being unemployed (a prospect that freaks me right out) – I am highly conversant with feeling trapped in a single job because there is nothing else out there for me.  That’s me – with a degree, a ton of professional training, eight years of supervisory and budgeting experience, eighteen years of communications positions under my belt, plus half a master’s degree and a mediation/negotiation certification underway. I can only imagine what it’s like for those fresh out of school, or with a long break in employment due to child-rearing or other life event.

Actually, I really don’t have to imagine because if there’s one thing being around the university again has exposed me to, it’s the life of younger people who are finishing degrees and attempting to get themselves into the world of work. From what I can tell – that’s next to impossible without offering oneself up to the altar of the unpaid intern these days. I have heard more than refrain on this subject: student can’t afford to work unpaid because they are no longer living at home, but no one will give them a job without work experience. Though I can’t verify this, I have also seen comments online indicating that local Co-op opportunities in certain fields are harder to come by than they used to be, since Co-op programs require a student to get paid, and companies (falsely) believe they do not have to pay interns.

On top of that, we’ve seen an explosion in the number of companies and groups (including federal government departments who are in the midst of huge layoffs!) applying to bring Temporary Foreign Workers into the country to address so-called labour shortages. Entry-level positions that newly-minted graduates are no longer available to those who won’t work for cheap or free. Skilled and professional labour is handed out to any company who can find workers willing to work for 15% less than the going Canadian wage. And suddenly the wages fall out of the bottom for everyone. And this doesn’t just impact Canadian workers – but those attempting to immigrate through skilled labour categories are finding that jobs filled with temporary foreign work are closing the skills gap that might otherwise allow them into the country. (TFW are allowed to apply for landed status after being here for a year, but it seems that outsourcing firms like iGate cycle their workers back and forth between countries to ensure they don’t get the chance to immigrate and leave their indentured servitude).

And yes, Stephen Harper made a promise yesterday to review the program – but it was his government who presided over the change last year that allowed companies to pay TFW’s 15% less than Canadian workers – part of what has made that program so very attractive to the 4000 organizations approved under a fast track aspect of the program last year. (Full list download available via the Alberta Federation of Labour). It’s hard to believe that the government had no idea (or intention) the program was being used this way until the Royal Bank  IT worker blew the whistle last week. The government’s response is simply classic crisis management – and I don’t believe we will see any substantial change to the program unless we continue to put pressure on them to do so.

The employment situation in Canada is untenable at the moment, with high unemployment and high-living costs rising simultaneous to a concerted push to drive down wages, and force young people into illegal working conditions. It’s hard to understand why Canadian business even wants to engage in this cycle – which creates only an illusion of profitability. Over time, driving down wages across the board in Canada does little more than cut the consumer base for goods and services, while forcing people on the margins into increasing reliance on government programs (EI, welfare, early pensions). Good wages across professional, skilled and unskilled sectors creates a larger tax base to draw from, the financial security that people need to make large purchases and investments, and overall improved indicators in areas like health, family services, and crime. Driving down wages in the short term may look like a good idea, but over the long run it creates a nation impoverished in more ways than one —  see America for an example.

And yes, I make no bones about the fact I’m a Keynesian.

Bottom line is that Canadians need to think about 1) whether they want to support a government that is so short-sighted, and cares so little about the well-being of their citizens and b) whether they want to continue supporting businesses engaged in undercutting unions, minimum wage standards and the right to immigrate to Canada with full status (as opposed to this TFW status that makes for the most precarious kind of labour. Personally, I’m looking at that list and I’m going to be culling from the companies I support – including RBC, and letting them know the reasons why. I’m also going to continue keeping my eye on the unpaid “internship” postings in Vancouver and sending notifications into the labour board as they arise.  This situation for workers is only going to get worse if we don’t do something to stop it.