According to new reports coming from Environment Canada (among other international climate change working groups) – by 2080, winter temperatures in central Canada will be 5C to 15C higher than at present. Internationally, the average surface temperature will rise 1-3C over the next few decades and extreme weather could create 150 million environmental refugees by 2050, severe water shortages in many parts of the world, a disruption of wildlife patterns and could trigger an ice age in parts of europe and north america (caused by ice floes melting into the atlantic ocean and creating dramatic cooling effects).
The dry winters we have experienced in what used to be a “rain” forest, the water shortages of the past summer, and the increasing numbers of forest fires hitting people throughout BC are to become an ever-present feature of our landscape it seems. Prince Rupert isn’t looking like such a bad option all of the sudden (it still rains up there almost every day).
So yesterday, Salon magazine online ran a story about packaged low-carb foods and how awful they are taste-wise. Lately, there have been a number of articles about the “new low-carb” trend and what people are eating to satisfy it – and really – this whole Atkins/low-carb thing is getting more and more twisted every day.
It’s one thing to cut out white sugar and flour – highly refined foods are stripped of nutrients and provide mainly empty calories – but to replace those processed foods with new ones even more loaded with chemicals and by-products but “low-carb” seems bizarre. Even worse is the fact low-carb diets are not conducive to exercise since carbs are what help our muscles to function properly.
Reading the ingredients in the packaged products discussed in the article – it really makes one question the health-value of them, and whether anyone could subsist on such food for any length of time…. Not to mention the new fast-food lettuce wraps which feature two patties of greasy meat wrapped in lettuce leaves – oh yeah, definitely an excellent alternative to those unhealthy fruits and whole grains.
This is without a doubt one of the saddest diet crazes to hit, offering people poor tasting, high-fat entrees and snacks – with little evidence that this plan works better than any other in the long-run. Not only that, but there is plenty of evidence that high-protein and high-fat diets over time can cause all sorts of health nasties. Of course, most people don’t stay on the diet long enough to encounter these problems – but then again most people don’t stay on it long enough to lose any significant amount of weight either.
The problem here is of course our societal messaging that says – “CONSUME” and “BE THIN” and “YOU’RE A NORTH AMERICAN, LIFE SHOULD COME EASY” – making for a combination of conflicts that diets such as Atkins make a lot of money on – coaxing people into believing that they can eat as much of their favourite foods as they want, without having to exercise – and this will bring them to their desired shape.
“Thin” does not equal “Healthy” – as these are two very different goals to work towards – and it’s a shame to see corporations encouraging people to destroy their health in a quest to be thin – just to fill their coffers.
So – I opened this blog two months ago and haven’t kept up with it. This is me trying again.
But it’s interesting coming back to it and to notice the quote in the previous entry from March. Very apropos given the number of soldiers in the news these days claiming that they were just following orders. A little disingenuous given the history of the 20th century and the voluminous testimony to the same effect at the Nuremberg trials. If we run a google news search on “i was just following orders” the results are pages and pages long these days – and just as in Nuremberg – the higher ups are saying “we didn’t know what was going on”.
Of course this is the fault of leadership, but not that it was weak in disciplining troops in Iraq, but that it took them there at all in the first place, convincing the American people that Arabs were less than human and then releasing well-armed hooligans onto the population, giving them carte blanche to wipe out the terrorist menace. Little surprise at this sickening outcome really.
And in other news… The Vancouver Sun today has the frontpage headline Crackdown hasn’t cut drug use in Downtown Eastside. This story references the extra 150 police that were put into Vancouver’s DTES several months ago to combat the drug problem. Of course at the time this was met with a lot of community criticism, and stories of abuses of police authority have flourished since then – but this story cinches it by reporting on a study that shows that rather than decrease drug use in the eastside neighbourhood – all the police did was spread it around, increasing the risk of HIV transmission and pushing people away from safe injection sites and needle exchanges. Good work boys! Not that this strategy hasn’t been tried time and time again in the US “Drug War” of the last two decades, to very little success – we had to try it here, one more time, just to see if we could somehow do it different.
As one of the report authors argues – “no matter how much you push in how many points, this problem doesn’t go away unless you deal with it in a more medical, comprehensive fashion.” Definitely words to pay attention to.