finally getting travel plans for the next 10 days or so worked out at the last minute this morning. i leave for winnipeg tomorrow and return to vancouver tuesday night (where i will be staying at the hotel vancouver because i can’t make it back to the sunshine coast given the time of my flight). i will go home to the coast wednesday, do laundry – pack my car and then thursday after work will head out towards winlaw, bc (just this side of nelson) to play at the wedding of jenny and paul and hopefully visit some friends out there too!
this tightness of schedule has me feeling a little harried, i would like to have a day of rest in there somewhere – but there is no room for slack in the next 10 days (although admittedly, much of the travel will be very social – and firetrap will be coming along to the koots to visit friends so i have a second driver which rocks).
i am right now trying to figure out a couple of things for the fall. one is whether or not to take the bc wildlife federation outdoors woman program in september in the lower mainland or at the end of october in sorrento (yes, i know, their politics leave a lot to be desired). sorrento is a little out of the way, but it would give me breathing space between now and then, and i already have plans booked into mid-september. i’m wondering if any of my gal-friends out there would be interested in the bcwf weekend? it costs $235 which covers everything and they give courses on shooting, fishing, kayaking, first aid and whole bunch of other things. the program for sorrento isn’t up yet, but you can check out the september program at their site. if you are interested in coming to sorrento and taking part in the course at the end of september, let me know because i will have room for a passenger or two and it really is gorgeous in the interior at that time of year (just before the snows come). other than the bcwf course, i know of no other woman-only lessons easily obtainable in bc – particularly shooting workshops. i have wanted to take this weekend of workshops for a couple of years now but it never fits into my schedule and they don’t happen that often. i am planning for this to be the year i finally get organized to get some of this training i have always wanted in a woman-supported environment (and have decided to forego diving lessons this fall to make room for this instead).
i’m not sure how much i will be blogging over the next 10 days, though i will endeavour to as long as i have computer access which will be the case in winnipeg, though not winlaw. my camera is charging up as we speak, and hopefully i will have lots of photos to share….

these days i feel that in order to write, i have to allow myself to grieve – a situation that acts as a powerful deterrent to committing my thoughts publically.
it is not that i am unhappy in my life – in fact things have been quite pleasant lately in my bubble of a world floating around the coast of sunshine and oceans and crystal clear rivers – i have had many wonderful visitors of late, many fine meals, and many good sleeps – and even work is rolling along at a productive but unstressful rate.
but the sockeye aren’t returning on the fraser this year (just like last year – and it’s probably climate change related), and last week a train carrying tanks of lye derailed and killed all the fish in the cheakamus river (and poisoned a number of people), and the government is spraying malathion on winnipeg to control the mosquitos, and a top military official just announced that the canadian military will have to remain in afghanistan for the next 20 years.
and it seems there is nothing we can do to escape the death culture into which we have all been born. that is, the culture that consumes rapaciously to no spiritual or cultural or even physical end – the culture that kills and poisons blindly in order to feed itself more comfort and convenience – the culture to which each of us is bound that tells us air conditioning is more important than salmon habitat, and unlimited cel phone access is more important than the migratory routes of songbirds.
if i write in depth about these things i am propelled to cry – and then cry harder all the more when i realize that one of the few people i could talk to about the depth of this killing (inside of me, outside of me), died last december of a heart attack.
and so i don’t. i don’t write about my grief for my friend, or for the salmon, or for afghani people subjugated by foreign soldiers. i don’t write about how much i fear the sockeye are never coming back, or how crushed i have been at the realization we will never know cedars of the size, presence and give (clothing, food, canoes) indigenous people here once did.
when i was passing through ocean falls, i said to my ex who lives there – “it’s just that i am tired of seeing everything i love be killed, over and over again” to which he answered “you have to focus on what is beautiful about the world, so many amazing things”.
is that the answer really? to not grieve? to count blessings without reflecting on what those blessings rely on? to avert the eyes to the easy experiences and realtionships when our relations to the land become increasingly more painful? it can’t be that simple. it can’t be that heartless.
if we think of a sick friend – someone very close who has been stricken by a killing disease – cancer maybe…. what if instead of strengthening our relationship to them, doing what we could to ease the pain (or cure it), doing what we could to comfort and love them in their last days – we turned away to healthier friends instead? what if instead of being there as a present witness to our friend’s suffering we found people more beautiful to whom we could draw our eyes? if we think about our relationship to the planet, to our bioregions and the critters within them in this way – it seems ludicrous to say – avert your eyes, focus on the other amazing things, don’t dwell in this place of grieving and loving because it is too painful. when painted this way, it seems downright wrong.
if it was someone we loved we would do everything in our power to save and protect them from the killing disease, and in fact our grief over the potential loss would be a powerful propellant to do so. the other points of power and strength in life become, with that grief, a fuel for action rather than a latent hopelessness.
we would expect nothing less of everyone else around us in this situation – that the pain of loss be resolved with the need for comfort and the desire for change – in all of us and for all of us (trees, water, fish, people) to stop the cancer.
so why is it that i shy away from this writing rather than allowing those emotions to guide my hand in expression and action?
i often feel that symbolic actions, non-violent civil disobedience and “peaceful” protesting leave a lot to be desired in terms of effect. this is not to say i don’t believe in a diversity of tactics, but it’s always a question of which tactic fits a given situation and whether the work put into organizing anything will have at least ripple out to some greater movement.
but – in the case of cindy sheehan – i can’t imagine a more powerful statement and i can see in her actions the seed of something that could have a powerful effect on the amercian psyche when it comes to the war.
this has gotten little press in canada because we are already so smugly anti-war up here – so if you haven’t heard of cindy, it’s not much of a surprise – though she is getting a lot of press attention in the states right now. to recap: cindy sheehan is the mother of casey sheehan, a 24-year old soldier who was killed last year in iraq. cindy believes that she has the right to speak to george bush, the man who consigned her son to death when he re-engaged the us military in iraq in 2003, and she is outraged by his refusal to meet with her and other grieving mothers who have fast come to the conclusion that the war in iraq certainly isn’t worth the price that so many families are having to pay. to that end, she has been waiting on the road outside of george bush’s texas ranch for the past several days. he continues to refuse to meet with her. (there is an excellent blog-post on the whole affair at the martian anthropologist which worth a read)
more and more women are going to join cindy there, outside the ranch, and the president’s people are threatening to have her arrested as a threat to national security. how about that twist in the plot of the new america? who suspected that grieving mothers could become terrorists with a few deftly placed media lines, and thus swept off the road and into the cells?
cindy, alone, has been a powerful presence in the us media in the past several days. she may or may not be arrested for essentially being a witness to war crimes. but no matter what happens in her individual case, the power of her actiongrowing is palpable. can you imagine if more grieving mothers started to turn up? what if grieving wives and children (and husbands, and fathers too) likewise turned up at the ranch in these last few weeks of bush’s summer holidays? would people shake their heads at the president? would they demand more? would it help to further undermine public support in the bloody mess that was stirred up when the sights were set over a decade ago?
the cynic in me says – no – cindy sheehan will fade away in the media once a shinier story is found by fickle journalists and the public will go back to their regularly scheduled programming…. but there is always a small part of me that hopes this small symbolic action will be the tipping point – the point of no return for the pro-war policies of the american politicians (from both parties) – the point at which the american people realize their dependence on foreign oil is a dependence on misery and death, not only of the people who live in the desert, but of their own as well. the point at which the people demand more of themselves, of their country, of their leaders. the point at which the troops are brought home.
is cindy the tipping point? or do we still have a much longer distance to go?