Economies and elections.

So I guess it’s no surprise, really, that the US stock market had a major meltdown yesterday. I mean, according to friends of mine who pay attention to this stuff, it’s been coming for a long time and was entirely predictable. Even to someone as economically-challenged as me, the whole subprime mortgage crisis which fueled this mess, seemed obviously set to happen from the get-go of “cheap” mortgages and no money down. And the fact that these investment companies, you know – the ones who encouraged impoverished people into homes they could not afford through shoddy lending policy, have suddenly spiraled into bankruptcy is (to be quite honest) pretty satisfying to watch. If only their failures didn’t screw the rest of us so bad at the same time.

I read an article today in the Globe and Mail about how this episode marks the end of conservative (unregulated) economics, at least for now. The last liberal economic cycle of course grew from the Great Depression and lasted until the 1970s. This economic turn, if not as deep as the Great Depression certainly gives some pause to examine the US government’s irresponsibility in allowing corporations to set their own rules for so long. In the end I suppose a few people make millions (or billions) but that handful at the top doesn’t possess enough votes to keep their own power in office, and most people in investment banking (even at the top of the corporate management chain) are cleaning out their desks today. On the precipice of an election. That can’t be good for the incumbent party who claim the government has no role in managing the economy. (Note that Bush and co. are trying to deflect everyone’s attention onto the hurricane damage in Texas today.)

So I’d like to believe that perhaps this collapse is the hopeful thing we’ve been waiting for, the one that exposes the Bush Republicans and their cronies (like Stephen Harper) for the dangerous buffoons that they are when it comes to managing the economic fortunes of their nations. If only. Despite the election predictions swirling out here my gut feeling is that those folks in the US and Canada who really feel this economic crisis (the ones already hanging onto their jobs by a thread, unable to fathom how to pay their home heating bill this winter) will stay home, alienated and scared, rather than turning out the vote against economic mayhem come election day. Or failing that, they will vote for independent candidates who are even further to the right and hate immigrants even more than McCain or Palin do.

I feel pretty lucky at times like this that my job is less tied to the contingencies of the market, and my partner is in the same boat – because if I worked in any sector that relied on spending right now I’d be feeling pretty nervous. On the other hand, a Conservative majority could put me out of work faster than you could say deregulation. Here’s to hoping that the era of conservative economics is over for now, and that this crisis demonstrates the need for regulation to protect us from the worst of greed’s excesses. If not, the robber barons will simply move behind the curtain for a brief period before unleashing their latest scam on the stock market (dot-com, real estate bubble, savings and loan – there have been at least a dozen since the 1980s), to the detriment of those who feel the real economic impact, the vast majority who make up society in the US.

We’re at another crossroads I suppose, but it still doesn’t seem like we will ever learn.

Signed first editions.

I’m not sure I’ve written much here about the small tradition of books Brian and I have given each other over the past year – some simply rare and beautiful, some autographed by their (now deceased) authors. It was an early excitement to discover that we are both people who enjoy the book not only for the contents within, but additionally for its form and aesthetic (Kindle be damned, McSweeney’s Quarterly has it right).

The first book was Walt Whitman’s Leaves of Grass, a 1947 edition with original pencil and ink drawings that I found early in our relationship at a rarities dealer in Ottawa. A book I fell in love with at first sight: woven cloth cover, odd-sized format, and exuberant populist artwork to match Whitman’s own hopeful poetry. I bought it for myself on a whim, but when walking away from the store I had a niggling thought…. perhaps this would be a gift for Brian. That is, if I knew him better, or for longer, or had an inkling of what type of thing was an appropriate first gift between us. I put it aside for Christmas, reasoning that if we were still together by then (3 months), I would know whether it was suitable or not.

And as it came upon us we were much more at ease, and so I wrapped this precious thing in star-covered cloth tied with a black velvet ribbon, offering it to him unsure still what his reaction would be. I had still never been in his house, you see, and I had no idea until he unwrapped my gift that in his home was a special bookshelf devoted to old and rare books (in particular poetry). He looked down at the book, and then up at me with some surprise, and I knew it was as perfect a gift then as any I could have chosen – apparently confirming that his secret hope to be well-matched had been met.

For my birthday I received a first edition (1936) of Carl Sandburg’s The People, Yes and a few months later I tracked down a first edition signed copy of Upton Sinclair’s two-volume Boston in time for the start of Brian’s 36th year. Upon his return from New York City this summer he bestowed upon me a signed paperback copy of Abbie Hoffman’s Steal This Book! in addition to a few other small treasures. These on top of many other less-collectible novels and comics that we have shared with each other in the days and months that became ours. A small treasury of coveted literary history which we envision putting on a shared bookshelf at some point in the future. (Geeky and romantic, yes, I know.)

This past weekend Brian gave me an unexpected gift “just because” of a first edition, signed copy of Al Purdy’s Sundance at Dusk – a slim chapbook in imminent danger of losing its pages to the cheap glue used in Canadian publishing at that time. Purdy is one of my favourite poets and has been since I first read his poetry in my grade twelve year of high school – a true character out of the wilds of Ontario, hopped a train and came to BC as an impoverished worker and writer where he spent most of his adult years give or take his trips to the Arctic, to Cuba, to wherever he plucked his images from. A figure of rough romance and excess, he was the landlord to some friends when I lived in Victoria and apparently always willing to throw down some literary critique for even the lowliest of poets.

This copy of Sundance is in pretty good shape if you don’t count the weakening glue, but I was dismayed to open it to the first page and see red-marked edits that someone had made on the poem “Lament”. I said to Brian, “who would go in and edit a poet’s printed work?” until he pointed out to me that the edits and Purdy’s signature were in the same colour of red ink. And when I looked closer, the lettering was of the same style (his signature is one very literal to his handwriting). At second glance it appeared that Purdy had not only signed this copy, but had corrected misprints for whoever had owned it…. Which I checked against the collected works of Purdy (Beyond Remembering to confirm that in fact, the “correct” version of the poem is as Purdy himself changed 32 years ago.

Better than simply a signed first edition, though I cannot say why. Because it was held for some moments by a poet I eternally admire? Because it proves his immortality despite passing on a few years ago? Because it is proof of his irritability at the printer who typeset his words improperly and thus gives the impression of the man he was? A strangely precious thing in any case, not unlike our tradition of books treasured like shared secrets.

(slightly) Food obsessed.

Brian & I have been eating happily in recent weeks – by which I mean both healthy and tasty food, not too much of it, and very balanced nutritionally. It’s something I keep wanting to write about, though I’m not sure what the compulsion is beyond wanting to let the world know that my physical and mental spirits are up these days.

Being partnered again seems to have brought my inner-domestic-goddess out of retirement and this summer I found myself perusing cookbooks and recipe magazines for the first time in years. Dinner parties! Barbeques! Canning! It’s been a lot more time in the kitchen lately and less eating out (with the exception of our holiday in Quebec) – and I am reminded anew of the pleasures found in experimenting with simple ingredients, planning shared dinners with my sweetie, and breaking bread with friends who ooh and ahh appreciatively.

It should be noted that after three live-in partners who did little more than mumble a thank-you at dinner time each night I vowed I was not going to do the domestic thing again. As much as I might try to be a good partner, I certainly have no interest in being anybody’s “wife” at the stage of things (what with the full-on career and union-leading thing that take up most of my time). But (fingers-crossed, please let it be true) it does seem this time things are different. Brian and I actually plan meals together. And cook side-by-side. He goes grocery shopping without being prodded. And if I return home from work later than him, he’s usually already got dinner on the table. Which brings a whole new enjoyment to the process for me. If I don’t feel like it, I don’t cook! And when there’s a big job (like a dinner party) the work is cut in half.

So all of this, plus the fact that eating at home is healthier and more economical, has been encouraging – though it is also making me a little food obsessive with the recipe searches and weekly planning. I should note too that both of us have lost weight in this process of more planned eating – this past year of travel and restaurant-eating has been hell on keeping a healthy weight for me!

In any case, I intend to share recipes here as it occurs to me to do so. In fact, here is one from last night’s dinner. Enjoy!

Mediterranean Salmon Salad
Serves 2 (Modified from Cooking Light recipe)

1/4 cup uncooked orzo
1 (6-ounce) salmon fillets
1 tsp olive oil
1/4 teaspoon salt
1/4 teaspoon dried oregano
1/8 teaspoon black pepper
1 cup1 torn spinach
1/2 cup chopped red bell pepper
1/4 cup chopped green onions
4 kalamata olives, pitted and chopped
3 tablespoons fresh lemon juice
1 tablespoon balsamic vinegar
1 tablespoons crumbled feta cheese

1. Cook pasta according to package directions, omitting salt and fat.
2. Saute salmon filet in small amount of olive oil – about 5 minutes on each side until fish flakes easily when tested with a fork. Let stand 5 minutes; break into bite-sized pieces.
3. Combine pasta, salmon, spinach, and remaining ingredients in a medium bowl; toss well. Serve either warm or cool.

Election madness.

There are just far too many elections going on at the moment for my liking – US Federal, Canadian Federal and BC Municipal – all in the next 2 months. Cringe and cover time people!

Elections really get me down – although I vote, and sometimes even campaign for the people I like – I just view them as more stress, more work, and another diversion from getting down to the things that matter. The federal election being an example very specific to my union work: there is a very good chance the collective bargaining will be cancelled or at the very least slowed until November as a result of Harper’s election call. And for what? Another minority government with the same composition? I think Canadians could have waited another year for that.

There’s something about an election that just reminds me of how powerless the process is. As Douglas’ speech above points out, it’s just fat cats and more fat cats – and these days we don’t even have a credible socialist alternative to buoy us (as far as I’m concerned the NDP is just another bunch of cats). I want it to be different, you know. I really do. But every election where I get even moderately excited about a particular candidate or leader only results in disappointment after the election is over.

Take Layton for example. I always vote NDP if I vote at all, and when Layton won the party leadership a few years ago I thought – okay, he talks well, seems to be getting down to the brass tacks of class, etc. etc. I was cautiously optimistic that perhaps he could bring some dynamism to the federal NDP for a change. A small hope.

But honestly – the fact Layton has spent three years talking about little more than ATM fees and the outrage of paying for text messaging? Are his advisors serious? Or just lining up Layton and co. to be the cranks of Parliament Hill? What about the nightmare of housing prices? The loss of arable land (and thus food security) to industrial development? The deregulation resulting in outbreaks of illness? The fact that Harper has muzzled the bureaucracy and is running the least accountable government in decades?

Oh no. ATM fees. Because that’s what Canadians are really concerned about. How insulting.

(To be fair, he has expended some of his precious talk time on Arctic sovereignty which I admit is a tad more interesting – but at the end of the day, working people don’t really care that much. And the NDP is supposedly our party – that would be the party of mice, not cats).

But it’s been a long time since any politician actually spoke the language of regular folks to the degree needed to moblize their vote. And I suspect that the biggest failure of this election campaign will be reflected in low voter turnouts. Why bother even listening when nothing is going to change? Why bother going to the polls early for more of the same? It gets me down people, it really does.

Which is why I’m trying my hardest to ignore the big picture, and just focus on my local candidate who I like (yay Libby!) Because otherwise I might end up not voting at all.