I rode on part of the Dunsmuir buffered bike lane today on my way to work – it’s still blocked off with City of Vancouver barricades and signs, but there are some place where you can get through now and it’s a heck of a lot safer than driving alongside the cars who now only have two lanes and are acting a bit resentful for it. I suspect it will take a few months for everyone to calm down about the new lane and the new viaduct lane as well, but I’m hopeful that the more cycling infrastructure goes in, the more it’s accepted as just a regular part of road infrastructure in the city.
Since the city announcement a couple of weeks ago ($10 million dedicated to cycling infrastructure), the commentary sections of local news sites have been boiling with driver rage aimed at pretty much everyone – transit users, pedestrians and cyclists alike. Part of this seems to stem from a misconception that ICBC insurance money and licence fees have something to do with road upgrades and since cyclists (and pedestrians) aren’t licensed or insured we shouldn’t get any additional roads infrastructure like separated lanes or traffic calming. If only that were so! But the reality is, insurance is simply insurance and vehicle licensing only pays for itself (as a way to ensure driver’s have got the mandatory training and testing). It’s property taxes that pay for this stuff people! And every single resident in Vancouver pays either directly or indirectly into the property-tax pot (except for those unfortunate homeless).
Oh! But the angry drivers say. Not that many people are using the new Dunsmuir Viaduct lane now (three months after its opening) so there’s the proof it isn’t warranted. Not to mention the fact only 4% of all trips are done by cycle currently in the city – clearly no one wants to cycle so why put in infrastructure? Correct, it is a sad fact that only 4% of trips are done by cycle and the viaduct lane is not extensively used as it could be (owing the fact that it doesn’t connect up eastbound with anything which will be corrected with the new buffered lane)…. but those folks would have it so that we only design the city for how we currently use it, and *never* use design to encourage different uses. Which would be news to pretty much any urban planner out there. That’s part of the visioning process that happens before plans are laid down on paper: What are the values and goals of this project? And since Vancouver has committed itself to “greener” and Canada has committed itself to lowerng greenhouse gas emissions… Well, there is a point at which you have to start designing your streets to live up to your promises.
It’s weird too, this opposition to buffered lanes, because as a driver I also prefer clearly delineated bike lanes and bike boxes at the intersections which make cyclists more visible to me. I’m not sure why drivers would prefer to keep the current set up of cyclists crammed over the the right, or darting out to make a left turn unless they really enjoy that heart attack feeling of having almost hit someone because they didn’t see them until right at the last minute. It hasn’t happened to me for many years (because I am uber vigilant) but I certainly note times when a cyclist has come up beside my vehicle and is a bit of a surprise I might have missed if a little less cautious.
I’ve heard also, that there are also some cyclists out there who oppose these lanes because they feel that buffered lanes will simply increase driver anger at cyclists and lead to more confrontation. Those folks argue that the best way to decrease the danger of cycling is by educating drivers better on sharing the road with cyclists. Which of course I agree with! We should definitely educate everyone better on the rules of the road. However, it won’t work to decrease the frustration that one group feels with another – and that includes pedestrians.
Sad as I am to say this, I was reading recently about a psychological state (which I can not remember the name of) revolving around mode of transport and sense of entitlement. So if I am a pedestrian, that is the mode I am identifying with at the time I am a pedestrian and I will feel entitled to more privileges than drivers or riders. Same if I am a rider or a driver. My mode of transport actually defines my psychological relationship to others during the time I am traveling, and it would require some real repatterning of human thought in order to defy what seems to come very naturally to us – which is this identification of mode of transport. Add to that the very real life/death encounters that can happen in the course of travel and you’ve got a lot of adrenaline pumping by the time you’re actually face to face with someone (out of their car/off your bike)…. it’s not likely that anyone is going to come away from that sympathizing with the other.
So we’ve got this buit-in barrier to understanding, even as people who might switch modes of transport because our identification is largely in the present….
Whatever the arguments I know this is true for me: 1) I want to live in a city with less cars, particularly in the downtown peninsula, 2) I want to be treated with respect, particularly when I am the more vulnerable player in an exchange, 3) I pay a lot of property taxes and feel entitled to road services that I can use on a daily basis (as a transit user and cyclist primarily), 4) I am way, way more likely to cycle when I feel like the route is safe – and buffered lanes make me feel a lot safer in the downtown core.
So I’m supportive, and I wish the city would do just a little more to educate people about how these upgrade are paid for, the fact that people who cycle for a living (couriers) do have to be licensed already and that the cost of running an licensing/insurance program for daily riders would hardly ever be worth it since most damage is inflicted by vehicles, not the other way around. I also wish that every driver had to spend an afternoon riding a bike in traffic before they were allowed to pass their driving test. However, at the moment I’ll settle for the buffered bike lane – it’s almost finished and I can hardly wait!
I’ve felt so far away from this blog lately and I have no idea why. It’s not that my mind is empty of ideas, thoughts, opinions…. or that I’m particularly down or unengaged….. but perhaps it’s this rest from writing I took in May. Or the fact I’ve been feeling crappy about my writing for quite awhile now. As in – “what’s the point” crappy. As in – “this is a ridiculous way to spend my time” crappy. And that feeling stops me before I even start, before I even realize I might want to start….
I think, though, that writing and photography and the other forms of art that I dabble in give me something even if they never go anywhere beyond this blog or the little projects I make and give to people – and whatever that something is, it helps me feel like a more human and whole being. Increasingly I’m feeling at odds with the notion of sending out work and having some arbitrary editorial panel judge it as either fit or not. And I’ve never cared much about getting paid since I have a job that remunerates me well and that I likely won’t quit due to the retirement income possibilities.
Yesterday, as I was driving home from my writing circle, I was reflecting on one of my favourite projects ever – the Lucipetal calendar I made a couple of years ago that combined photos and snippets of text – and how I still think about that project even two years later. Not because it was a perfect, polished thing – but because the writing felt honest and a bit rough overlayed on colour and movement as captured during a particularly chaotic time in my life. (I’m working on making it a slideshow to upload to my webspace….) I’ve been thinking a lot lately about those combinations of words and pictures and wondering what to do with projects like that in the future. Do I make them just to make them and give them away? Have a show? Put them on the Internet?
I’m not sure exactly. But I do know that I need to find regular time to practice art and writing even if it doesn’t “go anywhere” – because I miss just being able to come here and write without first having to explore why I haven’t been.

I’ve been blogging everywhere this week except here! But since I’m about to embark on a four-day holiday to Galiano Island I figured I should probably put in an appearance here today with a quick garden update. Not that there’s much to say except that my beans are sprouting in the garden, and quickly! Which means that planting them a week earlier than I was supposed to didn’t hurt them.
I should note that for the last week or so we’ve been regularly eating out of the garden – in particular radishes, joi choi, lettuce and the first spinach last night. Last Sunday’s shopping was the first time in months that I haven’t bought greens and I’ll be happy to see less and less produce in my grocery basket as the summer comes on and we’re taking more from the garden.
When I get back from the Island, I think it will be time to plant out my cucumber starts and possibly even my peppers which are currently languishing in the studio out back, all ready to flower with nowhere to go until I’m assured of warmer temperatures. I’ve got more of everything to plant, but the boxes out back are starting to look pretty damned green!
In other gardening news, on Tuesday we got the $1300 grant to move ahead with the boulevard gardening project and while at the ceremony, one of our project folks ran into someone from the city staff who was excited about us doing food plantings (including possibly fruit trees) as part of our project and suggested that the city might kick down for soil testing so we could be a community pilot project. We’ve got our first planning meeting next week so from there we’ll start mapping out the work plan, and figuring out what exactly to spend that money on.
It is definitely spring in the East Side garden, and I’ll be updating with more photos soon!
Goddamn I’m awash in ideas and inspiration right now! In addition to the activist-interview project I mentioned in yesterday’s post, I’m also decided on attempting an audio slide show piece about the boulevard-food-gardening project we’re embarking on with our neighbourhood grant this summer ($1300!). This will feed both my need to learn some new multimedia skills, as well as provide a nice document that could be used to convince the city to continue with this small grant program. (Brian went to the cheque-awarding last night and apparently more than 60% of the grants were handed out to neighbourhood food security projects of some incredible diversity).
So I’ve dusted off the digital recorder I bought two years ago (and haven’t used) and am taking it away this weekend to practice interviewing and recording with Brian. And I’m trying not to get pre-emptively frustrated by my rustiness at interviewing or crafting audio stories. It’s been so long since I took those sound courses in university, and even then it was all analog.
So far my plans look a little like this: 1) take lots of photos of everything related to my two project themes this summer, 2) get people to answer a series of questions via Facebook status updates for inspiration and ideas, 3) start getting people to do short interviews with me on one of my project themes, 4) start researching archival stills on my project themes. Oh – and yes, I need to learn all about the software to edit the audio and then the slideshow.
Good summer projects? It’s just investigating stuff I’m interested in already, so I’m hoping it doesn’t become too onerous.
For those who missed it last week, I posted about the boulevard grant at Among the Weeds. Additionally, I posted a bit of a rant at Viaduct yesterday about the crazy fighting over Grandvew Park.
This year seems to be one of retrospectives – or at least in my case I’ve now been asked to write two of them in commemoration of different activist histories. The first one was published last month in Resistance Magazine (posted below) in honour of the fortieth anniversary of Earth Day. The second I’ve been asked to write on twenty years of activism in BC for the Under the Volcano program this year, as well as participate in a workshop on the same topic. This is UtV’s twentieth anniversary and last year in operation, sadly bringing a particular icon of BC activism to a close.
While the forty-years piece was clearly a “history” piece for me – I’m not quite forty yet and can really only claim 23 years of involvement in activism – this twenty-years piece feels much more like a walk down memory lane. On Facebook yesterday I asked people to give me their action highlights of the last twenty years which generated a nice timeline of my own activist trajectory, including actions and groups I would have entirely forgotten otherwise. Definitely helpul as I work through my own process of determining what it is I want to say about it all. It’s not a chronology after all, it’s meant to be a reflection on the role and relevance of BC activists – or something like that anyway.
So I’m thinking about all this stuff and realizing how nostalgic I am for certain actions and movements and people – not to mention the twenty-two-year-old me who really believed that the revolution was right around the corner – and I’m thinking how lovely it would be to go and interview some of my friends of the last twenty years about their activism and their lives and whether their thinking about things has held up or not – how their activism shaped their lives. Not for the retrospective piece of course – but for another separate project. A blog project maybe? A book? A series for one of the activist papers? Perhaps even a series of audio shorts for Co-op radio?
Another project may not be possible, but I do think having worked across such diverse causes and communities gives me a different perspective than a lot of folks would otherwise hav. Just thinking aloud right now, perhaps some potential here for some summer-projecting?