
these days i feel that in order to write, i have to allow myself to grieve – a situation that acts as a powerful deterrent to committing my thoughts publically.
it is not that i am unhappy in my life – in fact things have been quite pleasant lately in my bubble of a world floating around the coast of sunshine and oceans and crystal clear rivers – i have had many wonderful visitors of late, many fine meals, and many good sleeps – and even work is rolling along at a productive but unstressful rate.
but the sockeye aren’t returning on the fraser this year (just like last year – and it’s probably climate change related), and last week a train carrying tanks of lye derailed and killed all the fish in the cheakamus river (and poisoned a number of people), and the government is spraying malathion on winnipeg to control the mosquitos, and a top military official just announced that the canadian military will have to remain in afghanistan for the next 20 years.
and it seems there is nothing we can do to escape the death culture into which we have all been born. that is, the culture that consumes rapaciously to no spiritual or cultural or even physical end – the culture that kills and poisons blindly in order to feed itself more comfort and convenience – the culture to which each of us is bound that tells us air conditioning is more important than salmon habitat, and unlimited cel phone access is more important than the migratory routes of songbirds.
if i write in depth about these things i am propelled to cry – and then cry harder all the more when i realize that one of the few people i could talk to about the depth of this killing (inside of me, outside of me), died last december of a heart attack.
and so i don’t. i don’t write about my grief for my friend, or for the salmon, or for afghani people subjugated by foreign soldiers. i don’t write about how much i fear the sockeye are never coming back, or how crushed i have been at the realization we will never know cedars of the size, presence and give (clothing, food, canoes) indigenous people here once did.
when i was passing through ocean falls, i said to my ex who lives there – “it’s just that i am tired of seeing everything i love be killed, over and over again” to which he answered “you have to focus on what is beautiful about the world, so many amazing things”.
is that the answer really? to not grieve? to count blessings without reflecting on what those blessings rely on? to avert the eyes to the easy experiences and realtionships when our relations to the land become increasingly more painful? it can’t be that simple. it can’t be that heartless.
if we think of a sick friend – someone very close who has been stricken by a killing disease – cancer maybe…. what if instead of strengthening our relationship to them, doing what we could to ease the pain (or cure it), doing what we could to comfort and love them in their last days – we turned away to healthier friends instead? what if instead of being there as a present witness to our friend’s suffering we found people more beautiful to whom we could draw our eyes? if we think about our relationship to the planet, to our bioregions and the critters within them in this way – it seems ludicrous to say – avert your eyes, focus on the other amazing things, don’t dwell in this place of grieving and loving because it is too painful. when painted this way, it seems downright wrong.
if it was someone we loved we would do everything in our power to save and protect them from the killing disease, and in fact our grief over the potential loss would be a powerful propellant to do so. the other points of power and strength in life become, with that grief, a fuel for action rather than a latent hopelessness.
we would expect nothing less of everyone else around us in this situation – that the pain of loss be resolved with the need for comfort and the desire for change – in all of us and for all of us (trees, water, fish, people) to stop the cancer.
so why is it that i shy away from this writing rather than allowing those emotions to guide my hand in expression and action?
i often feel that symbolic actions, non-violent civil disobedience and “peaceful” protesting leave a lot to be desired in terms of effect. this is not to say i don’t believe in a diversity of tactics, but it’s always a question of which tactic fits a given situation and whether the work put into organizing anything will have at least ripple out to some greater movement.
but – in the case of cindy sheehan – i can’t imagine a more powerful statement and i can see in her actions the seed of something that could have a powerful effect on the amercian psyche when it comes to the war.
this has gotten little press in canada because we are already so smugly anti-war up here – so if you haven’t heard of cindy, it’s not much of a surprise – though she is getting a lot of press attention in the states right now. to recap: cindy sheehan is the mother of casey sheehan, a 24-year old soldier who was killed last year in iraq. cindy believes that she has the right to speak to george bush, the man who consigned her son to death when he re-engaged the us military in iraq in 2003, and she is outraged by his refusal to meet with her and other grieving mothers who have fast come to the conclusion that the war in iraq certainly isn’t worth the price that so many families are having to pay. to that end, she has been waiting on the road outside of george bush’s texas ranch for the past several days. he continues to refuse to meet with her. (there is an excellent blog-post on the whole affair at the martian anthropologist which worth a read)
more and more women are going to join cindy there, outside the ranch, and the president’s people are threatening to have her arrested as a threat to national security. how about that twist in the plot of the new america? who suspected that grieving mothers could become terrorists with a few deftly placed media lines, and thus swept off the road and into the cells?
cindy, alone, has been a powerful presence in the us media in the past several days. she may or may not be arrested for essentially being a witness to war crimes. but no matter what happens in her individual case, the power of her actiongrowing is palpable. can you imagine if more grieving mothers started to turn up? what if grieving wives and children (and husbands, and fathers too) likewise turned up at the ranch in these last few weeks of bush’s summer holidays? would people shake their heads at the president? would they demand more? would it help to further undermine public support in the bloody mess that was stirred up when the sights were set over a decade ago?
the cynic in me says – no – cindy sheehan will fade away in the media once a shinier story is found by fickle journalists and the public will go back to their regularly scheduled programming…. but there is always a small part of me that hopes this small symbolic action will be the tipping point – the point of no return for the pro-war policies of the american politicians (from both parties) – the point at which the american people realize their dependence on foreign oil is a dependence on misery and death, not only of the people who live in the desert, but of their own as well. the point at which the people demand more of themselves, of their country, of their leaders. the point at which the troops are brought home.
is cindy the tipping point? or do we still have a much longer distance to go?
it’s prisoner justice day today – so if you know someone inside the prison system make sure to let them know you are thinking about them and say a prayer for their safety inside the machine.
taken from – http://mips.stanford.edu/public/abstracts/hastings.pdf
“Ocean “phosphorescence”, commonly seen at night when the water is disturbed, is largely due to the dinoflagellates; they occur ubiquitously in the oceans as planktonic forms, responding to mechanical stimulation when the water is disturbed by emitting brief bright light. Light emission may be seen in the wake of a large ship for some 20 miles. About 20% of marine species are bioluminescent and many are photosynthetic. “ Red tides” are transient blooms of individual dinoflagellate species. Phosphorescent bays (e.g., in Puerto Rico, Jamaica) are persistent blooms of this type.
Since dinoflagellates are stimulated to emit light when predators (e.g., crustaceans) are active, predators on the crustaceans might thereby be alerted to feed on crustaceans, resulting in a reduced predation on dinoflagellates generally. Predation on dinoflagellates may also be impeded more directly; the flash could startle or divert a predator, allowing that cell to escape predation. The response time to stimulation (msec) is certainly fast enough to have this effect.”
because a bunch of people have asked me questions about phosphoresence since i wrote about it and i really didn’t know much (so i researched it on the internet of course). i think this basically means that if there is a red tide in the area, you have a good chance of seeing phosphorescent micro-organisms since they are the same thing. red tides are thought to be on the increase due to climate change and human activity in lots of places so it seems as though these would be on the increase (and of course you do know that red tides mean – don’t eat the shellfish right)?

petroglyph of a flower in bella coola – ancient rock art for which there is no local mythology.
I…..
was super-motivated this morning – managed to track down a problem and talk to some people about it (the problem being one unit is using up 80% of the space on our internet server and we need to work something out with them vis a vis data storage needs), answered a bunch of emails that came in over the weekend, worked on a couple other small things….. and then it just fizzled out sometime after lunch… i hate it when that happens. emailed the guy who i was exchanging flirts with on the weekend and mentioned i wouldn’t mind hanging out again sometime. i keep wondering if he will respond or not. am terrible at this whole getting-to-know people thing. it’s much easier just to go to bed with someone and sort the rest of it out later though i recognize that’s not the most adult thing to do either. had to apply today to re-acquire my firearms possession & acquisition licence as i seem to have misplaced it in my move and not having the cert makes the fact i took the courses two and half years ago moot since i can’t prove it without. am often shocked at the number of people who can’t just email a government agent for basic information without also swearing profusely and/or insulting the person behind the machine. do you really think i will answer you faster because you are an asshole? does it make you feel better? am similarly shocked that someone in another unit thought it was okay to upload 20+ gigs of sattellite data onto our internet server without checking in with me – the webmaster – first…. as though we somehow have an unlimited storage capacity just waiting for giant databases to be fit into. have been thinking about learning how to fish lately, and also about writing a cookbook (again) centered around local wild foods. couldn’t fit all of these thoughts into a coherent blog-post which is why you are getting bullet-point fragments rather than lovely prose.